Will the ‘Voter Rights Yatra’ Act as a Lifeline for Congress in Bihar?
Bihar’s politics has
always been known for experiments and unexpected developments. From the JP
Movement and Mandal Revolution to the rise of the Grand Alliance and the
resurgence of the NDA Bihar has consistently played a pivotal role in shaping
Indian politics. In this continuing tradition, Rahul Gandhi’s ‘Voter Rights
Yatra’ is being seen as more than just a political campaign; it’s a symbolic
and strategic attempt to directly engage with the people at the grassroots
level.
When the caravan passed
through Nista village in Lakhisarai district, the atmosphere felt less like a
political event and more like a social festival. With vehicles moving through
rain-soaked streets, Congress-themed songs blaring from DJ speakers, and rows
of flags waving high, it was evident that this yatra was crafted to deliver an organized
message. Crowds in narrow lanes, excitement among children, and curiosity among
women transformed the journey into more than just a political display, it
became a communal experience.
Villagers could sense
that politics had moved beyond TV screens and newspaper headlines, it had
arrived at their doorsteps. This explains why women like sanitation worker
Putul Devi and Bibi Kaisar from the weavers’ colony began associating their
hopes with this yatra. One of the most striking aspects was the dominance of
Congress flags among the crowd; RJD or Left party flags were seen only
sporadically. Naturally, this raises the question is Congress treating this as
a joint Grand Alliance initiative, or is it a move toward its own
organizational revival?
Congress leaders claim
the yatra is part of a long-term strategy to activate their organizational
base. Since Krishna Allavaru took charge as in-charge of Bihar Congress,
campaigns like ‘Har Ghar Jhanda’ (a flag in every home) have been
launched, with a clear message to party workers that symbolism alone won’t
suffice visible support and crowd mobilization are crucial. In this sense, the
yatra is a litmus test for Congress. While RJD leaders describe it as part of
coalition ethics, the ground reality suggests Congress is using this
opportunity to transform from a junior partner to an equal stakeholder in the
alliance.
The crowds weren’t
limited to party workers ordinary citizens came forward with their questions
and concerns. This made the crowd’s composition both mixed and organic. The
real strength of any movement lies in this, when it transcends beyond cadre
mobilization and engages with the public’s lived experiences.
People’s eagerness to see
and meet Rahul Gandhi, women waving to him, and youth stepping forward with
excitement lent a new dimension to the yatra. However, some were disappointed
by the limited interaction due to security protocols. Initially, the main focus
of the journey was the issue of missing names from the voter list. During the
Election Commission’s Special Intensive Revision (SIR), the opposition alleged
that around 6.5 million names were removed. Rahul Gandhi repeatedly stated, “We
won’t let vote theft happen.”
As the yatra progressed,
its scope expanded. Issues like unemployment, the education system, exam paper
leaks, industrial decline, women empowerment, and even the Agnipath scheme
began to emerge. In the weaver colonies of Bhagalpur, Muslim women spoke about
livelihood and security concerns. In Lakhisarai, a young man sipping tea talked
about employment and economic stability. ASHA workers demanded a ₹26,000
honorarium, and workers from the gun factory union spoke of their families’
survival. Thus, the yatra evolved into a mobile grievance forum where people
voiced their problems directly to leaders.
The public mood during
the yatra appeared mixed, a combination of hope and frustration. While some
felt disheartened by the limited access to Rahul Gandhi, others viewed him as a
guardian figure. This mix indicates that people are no longer satisfied with
slogans alone, they want genuine sensitivity and dialogue. The Grand Alliancecomprisin
g Congress, RJD, CPI(ML), and VIP showcased its unity during the yatra.
However, the uneven presence of flags and the Congress’s prominence also
suggest the party's intent to claim a greater stake in the power equation.
Tejashwi Yadav giving
Rahul Gandhi sufficient space, and welcoming figures like Kanhaiya Kumar and
Pappu Yadav, indicates that he too recognizes the need for collective strength.
A stronger Congress can ultimately benefit the RJD as well. When asked whether
Congress would support Tejashwi as CM after being projected by him as PM
candidate, Rahul Gandhi avoided a direct answer, instead emphasizing “strong
partnership” and “mutual respect.” This signals that the alliance is not ready
to make its internal equations public just yet.
As the yatra gained
momentum, the NDA also started targeting it. Chirag Paswan labelled the RJD as
Congress’s sidekick, and JDU leaders claimed Congress couldn’t strengthen
itself while aligning with Lalu Prasad Yadav. These are familiar tactics trying
to expose internal fault lines. But on the ground, the yatra’s impact is
evident. The turnout, media coverage, and public engagement suggest that
coordination within the Grand Alliance is currently on solid footing.
Analysts believe that
such yatras can generate energy and euphoria among the masses, but the real
challenge lies in sustaining that momentum. In a youth-dominated state like
Bihar, if the connection with young voters continues, it could influence
election results. The flags, public enthusiasm, and outreach clearly indicate
that Congress no longer wants to remain a junior ally in Bihar.
Giving space to Rahul and
accommodating other young faces seem to be part of a long-term strategy. Both
hope and frustration coexist among the masses, but people are relating the
yatra with their day-to-day struggles. The issue of vote theft has become a
common thread uniting the opposition. Repeated criticism by rivals shows that
the yatra’s impact is not just confined to Bihar, it is reverberating across
national politics as well.
The ‘Voter Rights Yatra’
has injected fresh energy into Bihar’s political landscape. What began as a
campaign on missing voter names has now evolved into a broader dialogue on
unemployment, education, industry, women empowerment, and social justice. The joint
presence of Rahul Gandhi and Tejashwi Yadav is an attempt to show alliance
unity. For Congress, this is a chance at organizational revival; for RJD, it’s
a step toward realizing power aspirations.
How much electoral
benefit this yields remains to be seen, but one thing is certain, this yatra
has reignited the debate on voter rights across villages, streets, and
community forums. The essence of democracy lies in enabling the people to
directly raise their voices. Ultimately, this journey has become a
psychological boost for the Grand Alliance, a revival tool for Congress, and a
platform for the people of Bihar to assert their voices, a new direction that
could reshape Bihar’s electoral politics.
Additional Facts about
the Voter Rights Yatra:
Purpose:
The yatra was launched primarily to protest against the removal of 65 lakh
names from the electoral rolls in Bihar.
Leadership: Led by Rahul Gandhi, the yatra has
witnessed participation from other Grand Alliance leaders like Tejashwi Yadav,
Kanhaiya Kumar, and Pappu Yadav.
Route:
Covered dozens of districts in Bihar, including Lakhisarai, Bhagalpur, Patna,
and Gaya, touching rural and urban communities alike.
Public
Engagement: The journey included roadside meetings, impromptu speeches, and
direct dialogues with ASHA workers, weavers, students, and youth groups.
Symbolism:
Heavy presence of Congress flags signals the party’s intent to revive its
presence beyond being a junior partner in the Grand Alliance.
Media
Impact: Widely covered on digital platforms, regional TV, and social media, the
yatra created a visual and emotional connect with the masses.
Political
Message: The yatra is also a testing ground for the Congress's "mass
connect strategy" ahead of the 2025 Bihar Assembly elections.
Coalition
Dynamics: Despite being a joint front, the visible prominence of Congress in
the campaign indicates its strategic positioning for more influence.
National
Ripple Effect: The campaign has stirred discussions on voter disenfranchisement
and democratic participation at a national level.
Post a Comment